As the bridge between users and software, Graphical User Interface (GUI) is critical to the app accessibility. Scaling up the font or display size of GUI can help improve the visual impact, readability, and usability of an app, and is frequently used by the elderly and people with vision impairment. Yet this can easily lead to scaling issues such as text truncation, component overlap, which negatively influence the acquirement of the right information and the fluent usage of the app. Previous techniques for UI display issue detection and cross-platform inconsistency detection cannot work well for these scaling issues. In this paper, we propose an automated method, dVermin, for scaling issue detection, through detecting the inconsistency of a view under the default and a larger display scale. The evaluation result shows that dVermin achieves 97% precision and 97% recall in issue page detection, and 84% precision and 91% recall for issue view detection, outperforming two state-of-the-art baselines by a large margin. We also evaluate dVermin with popular Android apps on F-droid, and successfully uncover 21 previously-undetected scaling issues with 20 of them being confirmed/fixed.

Yuhui Su

Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences

China

Chunyang Chen

Monash University

Australia

Junjie Wang

Institute of Software at Chinese Academy of Sciences

China

Zhe Liu

Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences

China

Dandan Wang

Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Shoubin Li

ISCAS

Qing Wang

Institute of Software at Chinese Academy of Sciences

China

Deliberation is a common and natural behavior in human daily life. For example, when writing papers or articles, we usually first write drafts, and then iteratively polish them until satisfied. In light of such a human cognitive process, we propose DECOM, which is a multi-pass deliberation framework for automatic comment generation. DECOM consists of multiple Deliberation Models and one Evaluation Model. Given a code snippet, we first extract keywords from the code and retrieve a similar code fragment from a pre-defined corpus. Then, we treat the comment of the retrieved code as the initial draft and input it with the code and keywords into DECOM to start the iterative deliberation process. At each deliberation, the deliberation model polishes the draft and generates a new comment. The evaluation model measures the quality of the newly generated comment to determine whether to end the iterative process or not. When the iterative process is terminated, the best-generated comment will be selected as the target comment. Our approach is evaluated on two real-world datasets in Java (87K) and Python (108K), and experiment results show that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines. A human evaluation study also confirms the comments generated by DECOM tend to be more readable, informative, and useful.

Fangwen Mu

Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences

Xiao Chen

Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences

Lin Shi

ISCAS

China

Song Wang

York University

Canada

Qing Wang

Institute of Software at Chinese Academy of Sciences

China